Societal indifference about heterosexuality and homosexuality would cause a lot of confusion. A remarkable article in The Post supports this point. To say that same-sex unions are not comparable to heterosexual marriages is not an argument for intolerance, bigotry or lack of compassion although I am fully aware that it will be considered so by some.
Marriage is not an arbitrary construct; it is an honorable estate based on the different, complementary nature of men and women and how they refine, support, encourage and complete one another.
More significantly, the Massachusetts decision led to another major backlash at the federal and state level.
Polls show that frequency of worship service attendance is a factor in the opposition to gay marriage. What is the difference between civil unions, domestic partnerships and marriage? They point out, for instance, that homosexual couples who have been together for years often find themselves without the basic rights and privileges that are currently enjoyed by heterosexual couples who legally marry — from the sharing of health and pension benefits to hospital visitation rights.
According to the article, teenagers said it has become cool for students to proclaim they are gay or bisexual even for some who are not. It is exceedingly imprudent to conduct a radical, untested and inherently flawed social experiment on an institution that is the keystone in the arch of civilization.
The function of marriage is not elastic; the institution is already fragile enough. In our time, there are more not fewer reasons than ever to preserve the essence of marriage.
The result in California was especially difficult since it reversed the May state Supreme Court decision to grant gays and lesbians full marital rights. Redefining Marriage Around the World. Kids are jumping on it The following year, the Vermont legislature approved a bill granting gay and lesbian couples the right to form civil unions.
By definition it is not an open contract; its essential idea is fidelity. Today, 41 states have DOMAs on the books. Constitution that would have banned same-sex marriage nationwide.
In addition, in the U. In addition, Maine, Oregon, Washington state and California enacted domestic partnership statutes that grant many, though not all, the benefits of marriage to registered domestic partners. Among worldwide cultures, where there are so few common threads, it is not a coincidence that marriage is almost universally recognized as an act meant to unite a man and a woman.
California and Oregon have nearly identical schemes that allow couples to register as domestic partners and claim all of the state benefits conferred on husbands and wives. The American religious community is deeply divided over the issue of same-sex marriage.
During the s, Dr. Nor is this view arbitrary or idiosyncratic. Civil union laws in both New Jersey and New Hampshire recognize civil unions performed in other states. Massachusetts Department of Public Health, left the legislature no options, requiring it to pass a law granting full marriage rights to same-sex couples.
The Catholic Church and evangelical Christian groups have played a leading role in public opposition to gay marriage, while mainline Protestant churches and other religious groups wrestle with whether to ordain gay clergy and perform same-sex marriage ceremonies.
Obviously that is not always honored in practice. Over the next year, the ensuing battle over gay marriage could be heard in the halls of the U. We have reaped the consequences of its devaluation. Getting it firmly back in place is, as the lawyers say, a compelling state interest.
Unlike traditional marriages, civil unions and domestic partnerships are invalid outside the state in which they are granted — except in states that expressly accept them — and do not provide any federal marriage benefits.
On what principled grounds could the advocates of same-sex marriage oppose the marriage of two consenting brothers? BENNETT The institution of marriage is already reeling because of the effects of the sexual revolution, no-fault divorce and out-of-wedlock births.
There are other arguments to consider against same-sex marriage for example, the signals it would send, and the impact of such signals on the shaping of human sexuality, particularly among the young. See From Griswold to Goodridge: Federal protections conferred by marriage include 1, laws and policies, such as Social Security, family medical leave, federal taxation and immigration policy.Jun 26, · The Issue of Gay Marriage Summary This essay debates the issue of same sex marriage in the United States.
It considers the pros and cons and examines the constitutional issues involved. who wrote “For Gay Marriage” and William J. Bennett, who wrote “Against Gay Marriage” use in there articles. Gay Marriage Essay; Marriage. For and Against Gay Marriage and in “Against Gay Marriage” William J.
Bennett expresses himself against same-sex marriage. The Complicated Moral Debate The debate on gay marriage is a complicated one. Many different emotions, ideas, and opinions are formed from the subject.
Apr 16, · An Overview of the Same-Sex Marriage Debate. Updated Nov. 21, In this article: To date, only New Mexico, New York and Rhode Island have no law either banning or allowing gay marriage. The same-sex marriage debate may have had an impact on the outcome of the presidential election.
Ohio, which in was holding a referendum on a. In their works “Let Gays Marry,” by Andrew Sullivan and “Leave Marriage Alone,” by William Bennett, they both talk about the subject of same sex marriages. More about Comparing William Bennett's Leave Marriage Alone and Andrew Sullivan's Let Gays Marry.
Let Us Legalize Gay Marriage Essay Words |. An Exchange on Same-Sex Marriage William Bennett and Andrew Sullivan Let Gays Marry Andrew Sullivan. A state cannot deem a class of persons a stranger to its. By William J.
Bennett May 21, We are engaged in a debate which, in a less confused time, would be considered pointless and even oxymoronic: the question of same-sex marriage.Download